From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>, Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: d80211: How does TX flow control work?
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 12:41:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4637195E.5050907@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <460B7CAA.4020604@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1334 bytes --]
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> The actual problem was meanwhile identified: shorewall happened to
>>> overwrite the queueing discipline of wmaster0 with pfifo_fast. I found
>>> the magic knob to tell shorewall to no longer do this (at least until I
>>> want to manage traffic control that way...), but I still wonder if it is
>>> an acceptable situation. Currently, the user can intentionally or
>>> accidentally screw up the stack this way.
>> I don't seem to be able to do that:
>>
>> # tc qdisc change dev wmaster0 pfifo
>> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>>
>> # tc qdisc replace dev wmaster0 pfifo
>> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>>
>> what exactly does shorewall do?
>>
>
> Don't recall... need to re-test... lacking time. :(
>
> Just one note: I observed this on a 2.6.19 kernel - in case there is a
> difference to the latest.
>
Now I came across this issue once again. It is still present, I just
observed it over the latest rt2x00 tree after updating shorewall and
forgetting to fix its config.
I redirected tc to some logging filter, and this is what shorewall does
when "CLEAR_TC=Yes" is set in shorewall.conf:
...
tc qdisc del dev wmaster0 root
tc qdisc del dev wmaster0 ingress
tc qdisc del dev wlan0 root
tc qdisc del dev wlan0 ingress
HTH,
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <459A5945.80909@web.de>
[not found] ` <20070103185203.2754e059@griffin.suse.cz>
[not found] ` <459BF179.6000906@web.de>
[not found] ` <20070103191853.4f440b8b@griffin.suse.cz>
[not found] ` <459BFB05.9040608@web.de>
[not found] ` <45A03825.9080807@web.de>
[not found] ` <45A2A728.1070404@web.de>
2007-03-27 20:58 ` d80211: How does TX flow control work? Johannes Berg
2007-03-29 8:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-05-01 10:41 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2007-05-01 10:47 ` Jiri Benc
2007-05-01 10:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-05-01 11:04 ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-01 13:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-05-01 13:26 ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-01 14:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-05-01 15:25 ` Jiri Benc
2007-05-01 17:01 ` Michael Wu
2007-05-01 18:57 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4637195E.5050907@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).