From: James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Update stop_queues kdoc
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:32:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46605814.1090806@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706011204.23666.flamingice@sourmilk.net>
Michael Wu wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2007 09:58, James Ketrenos wrote:
>> In this way we are putting in a work around that doesn't result in an API
>> change, and that can eventually (hopefully) be fixed the "right way"
>> (whatever that may end up being)
>>
> A workaround could be implemented, but I currently don't see any cases where
> stopping/waking the queue outside of open/stop/tx is necessary or correct.
Is calling the ieee80211_stop_queue[s] from open/stop OK then? The doc update said only in ops->tx. Should the driver be calling it in the stop callback, or will the stack stop the queues for us?
iwlwifi currently calls ieee80211_stop_queue from the Tx handler and calls ieee80211_stop_queues in the event the adapter is reset (due to HW error, RF kill transition, hw tear down, etc.) as it asynchronously brings re-initializes the hardware.
We definitely need to wake the queue outside of open/stop/tx. If you stop the queue due to the HW ring being full, you won't be able to wake the queue until the HW has asynchronously freed a Tx slot.
iwlwifi calls ieee80211_wake_queue during buffer reclaiming after the HW indicates the Tx has completed.
James
> (in bcm43xx, stopping the tx rings is more correct and effective for what is
> being done there - stopping TX so the radio can be recalibrated)
>
> -Michael Wu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-01 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-01 9:29 [PATCH] mac80211: Update stop_queues kdoc Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 9:48 ` Johannes Berg
2007-06-01 9:53 ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 11:55 ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-01 20:42 ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 21:00 ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-01 21:42 ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 21:53 ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-02 13:17 ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-02 13:37 ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-02 18:41 ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-01 16:58 ` James Ketrenos
2007-06-01 19:04 ` Michael Wu
2007-06-01 17:32 ` James Ketrenos [this message]
2007-06-01 20:36 ` Michael Wu
2007-06-01 20:52 ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 20:41 ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 20:52 ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-01 20:54 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46605814.1090806@linux.intel.com \
--to=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
--cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).