linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi MSI support (rev3)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:02:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4671C91E.4020800@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070614154743.140dd6b5@localhost>

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:52:42 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
> 
>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> The previous patch would crash on remove. pci_disable_msi has to be
>>> called after free_irq.  FYI - pci_disable_msi is safe if MSI hasn't been
>>> enabled.
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211/iwlwifi/base.c	2007-06-13 11:10:10.000000000 -0700
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211/iwlwifi/base.c	2007-06-14 11:47:01.000000000 -0700
>>> @@ -8117,10 +8117,13 @@ static int iwl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev 
>>>  	/* If power management is turned on, default to AC mode */
>>>  	priv->power_mode = IWL_POWER_AC;
>>>  	priv->user_txpower_limit = IWL_DEFAULT_TX_POWER;
>>> +
>>> +	pci_enable_msi(pdev);
>> The API wants fixing, if code that fails to check return value of 
>> pci_enable_msi() is being written.
>>
>> We should definitely be checking the return value there...
>>
>> 	Jeff
>>
> 
> I don't understand. pci_enable_msi() returns error if device doesn't
> do MSI, that's fine.

It also returns errors for conditions other than "doesn't do MSI", and 
therein lies the problem with not checking return values.

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-14 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-14 18:48 [PATCH] iwlwifi MSI support (rev3) Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-14 18:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-14 20:17   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-14 22:47   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-14 23:02     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-06-15  0:11       ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4671C91E.4020800@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).