From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp146.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.146]:33881 "EHLO
	smtp146.iad.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752078AbXGQCRG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:17:06 -0400
Message-ID: <469C2644.3060701@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:15:32 -0400
From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: STA reassociation improvements
References: <20070715140251.B4F6B7B409F@zog.reactivated.net> <20070716185616.58030016@griffin.suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20070716185616.58030016@griffin.suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Jiri Benc wrote:
> [removed netdev, no reason for sending this there]

Was I wrong for sending the patch there, or was it just your ACK that 
you didn't think would be relevant on netdev?