From: Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23 3/3] [wireless] orinoco: create a Kconfig option for Prism2
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:19:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A6EB79.5040403@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185341420.12322.44.camel@dv>
Pavel Roskin wrote:
> I'm sorry, but considering your original patch, I just cannot be sure
> that you will get the PCMCIA IDs right. I cannot be sure I'll get it
> right myself. It requires a lot of searching and detective work.
We can always begin with the set that is common to both (PCMCIA) drivers.
You're proposing to do nothing but at the same time you say that HostAP
claims it can support some cards when it actually doesn't, which is a
rather important bug IMHO.
I understand that you're maintaining orinoco and not hostap but this is
an issue that affects your "users" too, not to mention the overall
quality of the kernel.
My patch affected a douzine of PCMCIA IDs, don't you think we can safely
correct these?
> On the other hand, I haven't heard many complains about the ID clash
> recently. It seems to me that users learned how to deal with it.
> Distributions do a great job too. For instance, Fedora renames network
> devices based on the MAC addresses, so the same configuration will work
> with either orinoco of hostap.
>
> Of course, those who want to run an 802.11b AP know that they should
> choose hostap, but most users don't need that.
You haven't heard many complaints recently because there aren't many
users recently...
And this is not about network interface names or AP mode.
You may disagree, but IMO HostAP is a *much* better driver for Prism2
devices in all modes.
And if you have both drivers compiled as modules (as most distributions
do) you have to either blacklist orinoco or manually unbind the driver
from the hardware using /sys.
I'm maintaining hostap-utils for Debian and we are shipping a blacklist
for orinoco for years because of the numerous reports of users who
weren't be able to use HostAP.
This is suboptimal though, since it breaks (= no driver loaded) when the
user actually has a Lucent Orinoco card.
I understand your reluctance but I think it's way past the time you
should have passed Prism2 to HostAP.
Best regards,
Faidon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-25 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-22 13:17 [PATCH 2.6.23 3/3] [wireless] orinoco: create a Kconfig option for Prism2 Faidon Liambotis
2007-07-22 17:14 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-07-23 22:07 ` Faidon Liambotis
2007-07-25 5:30 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-07-25 6:19 ` Faidon Liambotis [this message]
2007-07-25 16:32 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-08-01 3:33 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-08-01 5:55 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-07-23 1:42 ` David Gibson
2007-07-23 6:10 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-07-23 6:20 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A6EB79.5040403@debian.org \
--to=paravoid@debian.org \
--cc=hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).