From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix machine check errors for PPC architecture with BCM4306/2
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:12:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EC2E84.4080901@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709152010.07647.mb@bu3sch.de>
Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Saturday 15 September 2007 20:07:22 Larry Finger wrote:
>> Your comments may be correct; however, the fact remains that with a rev 4 BCM4306, the original code
>> generates many, many machine checks on PPC architecture, and I get reads with all ones on i386
>> indicating that the read is invalid. These all occur before the firmware is loaded. Making the
>> "gmode" bit mimic the behavior of the phy_connected variable of bcm43xx gets rid of the problems on
>> both platforms.
>
> Sure. But if you workaround this like that, you could
> as well get completely rid of the gmode bit, as you always force it on.
> But I think that's not what we want. The real fix is simple. See below.
>
>
>> If you can suggest a reordering of the initialization that delays PHY setup until the "magic step"
>> that eliminates this problem is done on/to the ssb backplane, I will be happy to test it. I was
>> unable to find such a solution.
>
> There is no reordering needed.
> You just need to find out why phy->gmode was not set.
> I think it's set based on the have_gphy and have_bphy bits.
> So you need to look there why one of these is not set. That is the real
> cause of the issue.
In the original code, have_gphy was true, and phy->gmode was set. These variables were not the cause.
In bcm43xx, the second argument to wireless_core_reset controls the value of phy->connected at exit.
This behavior is missing in the original b43legacy (and in b43). For b43, it seems to have no
consequence, but for the early PHYs, phy->connected controls when certain registers can be
read/written and affects the program flow through the phy and radio initialization. The lack of the
ability to toggle gmode is what leads to the register errors, and this is what my change restores.
The name could be changed, but that seems more intrusive than necessary.
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-15 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-15 17:39 [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix machine check errors for PPC architecture with BCM4306/2 Larry Finger
2007-09-15 17:48 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-15 18:07 ` Larry Finger
2007-09-15 18:10 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-15 19:12 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2007-09-15 19:47 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-15 21:01 ` Larry Finger
2007-09-15 21:58 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-15 23:26 ` Larry Finger
2007-09-15 23:58 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46EC2E84.4080901@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).