From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115]:37280 "EHLO
	mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751747AbXISRzi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:55:38 -0400
Message-ID: <46F162AF.9050903@lwfinger.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:55:59 -0500
From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
CC: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: Change loglevel of radio-enable message.
References: <200709191858.38634.mb@bu3sch.de>
In-Reply-To: <200709191858.38634.mb@bu3sch.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Michael Buesch wrote:
> Also cleanup the code a bit and remove the inline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>

> @@ -2214,7 +2229,7 @@ static int b43_chip_init(struct b43_wlde
>  	b43_radio_turn_on(dev);
>  	dev->radio_hw_enable = b43_is_hw_radio_enabled(dev);
>  	b43dbg(dev->wl, "Radio %s by hardware\n",           <========================
> -	       (dev->radio_hw_enable == 0) ? "disabled" : "enabled");
> +	       dev->radio_hw_enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");

Shouldn't this one be b43info rather than b43dbg?

Larry