From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115]:49370 "EHLO
	mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758845AbXI0WRO (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:17:14 -0400
Message-ID: <46FC2BE9.2050705@lwfinger.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:17:13 -0500
From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
CC: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: RF-kill support
References: <200709272135.35686.mb@bu3sch.de> <200709272241.06570.mb@bu3sch.de> <200709272312.43994.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200709272303.57040.mb@bu3sch.de>
In-Reply-To: <200709272303.57040.mb@bu3sch.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Michael Buesch wrote:
> 
> Yeah, sure. But it's not useless. The other functionality is still available.
> I'll fix that. But in a seperate patch. No need to delay this one because
> of this (IMO) minor issue.
> 

How long will the delay be? If relatively short, I'll wait for the final one before submitting the
port to b43legacy.

Larry