From: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Subject: Re: iwl4965 detection problem
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:10:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4721F55F.1030303@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4721E17E.2020908@sgi.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 839 bytes --]
Jes Sorensen wrote:
> At least it's consistent here as opposed to sometimes.
>
> One thing I noted is that rmmod often takes a few seconds, no idea
> if it has any value?
Ok,
I think I have an idea at whats going on - loading the module with debug
info revealed that it ended up straight in the interrupt handler the
moment the driver called request_irq(), but obviously before it was
ready to handle the interrupt in question. The net result was that it
didn't get to the loading of the ucode.
Unloading the module meant a call was made to iwl_disable_interrupts()
so on the next load, all pending interrupts in the chip had been cleared
and we didn't see this spurious interrupt.
I haven't had a chance to build the driver with this change, ie. it's
untested, but I have a suspicion that this patch might do the job.
Cheers,
Jes
[-- Attachment #2: iwl4965-irq-fix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 707 bytes --]
Disable interrupts in the iwl4965 before calling request_irq() for
the case that the previous OS or the BIOS left a pending interrupt in
the chip. This behavior has been observed on some laptops such as T61
Thinkpads and Toshiba Portege R500
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
--- linux/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c~ 2007-10-26 06:49:02.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c 2007-10-26 16:03:40.387241088 +0200
@@ -9090,6 +9090,8 @@
priv->power_mode = IWL_POWER_AC;
priv->user_txpower_limit = IWL_DEFAULT_TX_POWER;
+ iwl_disable_interrupts(priv);
+
pci_enable_msi(pdev);
err = request_irq(pdev->irq, iwl_isr, IRQF_SHARED, DRV_NAME, priv);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-26 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 13:37 iwl4965 detection problem Jes Sorensen
2007-10-25 13:45 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-25 14:15 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-25 17:32 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-26 8:05 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-26 12:30 ` John W. Linville
2007-10-26 12:45 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-26 14:10 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2007-10-26 14:41 ` John W. Linville
2007-10-26 14:43 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-26 15:17 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-26 15:23 ` dragoran
2007-10-26 16:50 ` John W. Linville
2007-10-29 1:14 ` Zhu Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4721F55F.1030303@sgi.com \
--to=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).