Re: Change error message for failed rc module

[dragoran <drago01@gmail.com>]

Johannes Berg wrote:
>   
>> won't this conflict with drivers that want to use their own rate scaling 
>> modules? (like iwl3945/4965)
>>     
>
> The rate control algorithm should be per-hw struct. We still don't have
> the "driver preference" patch applied because of some things, but in any
> case it is possible to have an algorithm for each hw.
>
>   
ok
> Besides, currently, afaict, if you first load rc80211_simple and then
> iwlwifi, the latter doesn't really work well if at all due to simple
> being used. That needs to be fixed anyway, the right solution is that
> patch we were discussing a long time ago with driver preference for rate
> control algorithm (though ISTR there were still some issues with it and
> I don't remember whether the initial version was applied)
>
>   
seems not I was unable to find it in git but I found the thread about it it:
http://marc.info/?t=118801173400003&r=1&w=2
seems you had some concerns that have not been adressed yet.