From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/T V2] b43: Fix Radio On/Off LED action
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:22:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <474C8A8E.6070404@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711272120.44575.mb@bu3sch.de>
Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2007 21:02:47 Larry Finger wrote:
> Is the switch properly polled and is the status change properly reported upstream?
> If yes, you might want to check (add printk to rfkill code) if the LED
> is properly triggered.
I know that b43_rfkill_poll() is being called as I can see the ENABLED/DISABLED messages in the log.
I'll have to work my way through the things it calls.
> I'm wondering who causes this deadlock. "registered" should be false if
> we are called back from rfkill_initialize, so it should return early before
> the lock.
The following code has the competing lock:
static int rfkill_toggle_radio(struct rfkill *rfkill,
enum rfkill_state state)
{
int retval;
retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rfkill->mutex);
if (retval)
return retval;
if (state != rfkill->state) {
retval = rfkill->toggle_radio(rfkill->data, state);
if (!retval) {
rfkill->state = state;
rfkill_led_trigger(rfkill, state);
}
}
mutex_unlock(&rfkill->mutex);
return retval;
}
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-27 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-27 16:03 [RFC/T] b43: Fix Radio On/Off LED action Larry Finger
2007-11-27 16:13 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 16:28 ` Larry Finger
2007-11-27 17:05 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 18:29 ` Ehud Gavron
2007-11-27 20:02 ` [RFC/T V2] " Larry Finger
2007-11-27 20:20 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 21:22 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2007-11-28 14:11 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-28 15:05 ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 16:13 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-28 16:41 ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 16:46 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-28 17:08 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=474C8A8E.6070404@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).