From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22]:64257 "EHLO viefep15-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933900AbXLMXBQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:01:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4761B9C0.3080309@jooz.net> (sfid-20071213_230129_548257_6C3D5FA5) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:01:20 +0100 From: Bjorge Dijkstra MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John W. Linville" CC: linux-wireless Subject: Re: status wireless extensions API for new drivers References: <4761A108.2080005@jooz.net> <20071213213118.GE3083@tuxdriver.com> <4761AD18.8000004@jooz.net> <20071213221323.GF3083@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20071213221323.GF3083@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: John W. Linville wrote: > BTW, how is your patchset looking? If you want it to be in 2.6.25 > then you need to post it soon. > It's currently in the form of a seperate self supporting package based on an older kernel. So that probably needs a little bit of work to get it rebased on current kernel. It's not a must for me to get it in 2.6.25 though, so if we miss it that's not a problem. BTW, when is the approx. deadline for 2.6.25? > FWIW, as long as you have just enough WEXT support to get it to work > with open networks I think that would be enough to get a patch merged. > Having experimented a bit earlier with your patchset, I suspect you > can probably support WEP and maybe more by now... Yes, WEP, WPA and WPA2 all should work fine. I'm using it everyday on a WPA2 network with no issues. I don't have a wired connection here, so I depend on it working for me :) > > So, when will we see your patches? > I'll try get something out during the weekend. > Thanks, > > John regards, Bjorge