Re: [PATCH RFT] b43: We need lots of regression testing

[gavron@wetwork.net]

Works great on my 4311 rev 01.
E

Michael Buesch wrote:
> Hi b43 users,
>
> Please be so kind to run lots of regression tests on the following
> patch. This patch is supposed to make the LO calibration a _lot_ more
> lightweight and avoid a long MAC-disable period every 120 seconds.
>
> We need a lot of regression testing with this patch on lots of different
> devices to make sure we don't introduce regressions.
>
> I tested this on a 4306 and a 4318 card. So far it seems to work great
> on these cards.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
>
> Subject: Re: b43: 1 second "freeze" every 2 minutes - works with bcm43xx
> Date: Friday 04 April 2008
> From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
>
> Can you try the following patch?
> http://bu3sch.de/patches/wireless-testing/20080404-1408/patches/010-b43-calibrate-lo-on-demand.patch
>
> This patch is supposed to distribute the calibration bursts over time,
> so that calibration only happens when it's actually needed.
> So instead of disabling the MAC every 120 secs and recalibrating the
> whole calibration tables, we assign a timeout to each calibration value
> and only recalibrate it if it's
> a) expired and
> b) currently used.
> Recalibration might also happen on TX power adjustment, if the corresponding
> calibration item is no longer in the cache because it has expired. That
> actually happens most of the time, but we can live with it, as power adjustment
> doesn't happen that often and calibration is a _lot_ cheaper.
>
> This patch also reduced overall memory consumption by nuking the
> huge static calibration tables.
>
> Disclaimer:
> The algorithms in this patch are completely redesigned and have nothing in
> common with how broadcom does the stuff in the proprietary driver. So it's
> highly experimental and I'm not responsible in case this patch eats your cat.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>