From: gavron@wetwork.net
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] b43: We need lots of regression testing
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 03:48:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F758E7.3050306@wetwork.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1207364787.2115.16.camel@dv>
I had a case of total disassociation last night, and it is unusual. NM
was unable to reconnect (so we go to bash).
A scan revealed no APs but after a module reload they are back...
What further testing or other diagnostics can I run should this happen
again to rest?
Thanks
E
[root@egdell ~]# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 No scan results
[root@egdell ~]# rmmod b43
[root@egdell ~]# modprobe b43
[root@egdell ~]# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:16:01:B9:F9:3F
ESSID:"wetwork"
Mode:Master
Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)
Channel:6
Quality=71/100 Signal level=-64 dBm Noise
level=-69 dBm
Encryption key:on
Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s
11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s
48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s
Extra:tsf=00000266671a2b44
Cell 02 - Address: 00:16:01:B9:FE:8F
ESSID:"wetwork"
Mode:Master
Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)
Channel:6
Quality=98/100 Signal level=-36 dBm Noise
level=-69 dBm
Encryption key:on
Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s
11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s
48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s
Extra:tsf=000002cd08cbc1ce
Cell 03 - Address: 00:16:01:B9:F5:1F
ESSID:"wetwork"
Mode:Master
Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)
Channel:6
Quality=61/100 Signal level=-74 dBm Noise
level=-69 dBm
Encryption key:on
Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s
11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s
48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s
Extra:tsf=0000021011e7a0e7
[root@egdell ~]#
Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 16:12 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>
>> Hi b43 users,
>>
>> Please be so kind to run lots of regression tests on the following
>> patch. This patch is supposed to make the LO calibration a _lot_ more
>> lightweight and avoid a long MAC-disable period every 120 seconds.
>>
>> We need a lot of regression testing with this patch on lots of different
>> devices to make sure we don't introduce regressions.
>>
>> I tested this on a 4306 and a 4318 card. So far it seems to work great
>> on these cards.
>>
>
> Tested on this:
>
> b43-phy0: Broadcom 4306 WLAN found
> b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 2, Type 2, Revision 2
> b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2050, Revision 2
> phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid'
> Broadcom 43xx driver loaded [ Features: PMLR, Firmware-ID: FW13 ]
>
> It's actually Fedora development kernel 2.6.25-0.195.rc8.git1.fc9.i686
> with patched compat-wireless installed.
>
> It's working better than I could possibly expect. The range is on the
> par with another laptop with ipw3945 running Linux or Windows XP. It's
> working through 4 walls and 30 meters on top of that. I understand that
> there are many random factors involved, but my impression is very
> positive. Basically, it's good enough to go outside with the laptop
> without having an AP installed near a window. I haven't seen any
> significant interruptions in the connection.
>
> Unfortunately, I hit that nasty circular lock dependency bug (already
> discussed in another thread) when I killed wpa_supplicant to try another
> AP. The CPU utilization went to 100%, but the driver kept working.
>
> Another unrelated bug (sorry, testing often finds unrelated bugs) is
> that scanning with specific ESSID was returning non-matching APs. I
> mean "iwlist wlan0 scan my_essid", which would still report many
> different ESSIDs. It's inconvenient when the driver can sense 22 APs at
> once :)
>
> I'll try to get 4318 tested over the weekend.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-05 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 14:12 [PATCH RFT] b43: We need lots of regression testing Michael Buesch
2008-04-04 20:01 ` gavron
2008-04-04 20:02 ` Michael Buesch
2008-04-05 3:06 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-04-05 9:09 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-06 5:12 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-04-05 10:48 ` gavron [this message]
2008-04-06 5:46 ` Pavel Roskin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-06 8:23 Ronald
2008-04-07 1:26 ` Pavel Roskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F758E7.3050306@wetwork.net \
--to=gavron@wetwork.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).