From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88BC138BF7F; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784885396; cv=none; b=KYABxqIT+INpmfeVuB4Gy6z9QNKSeGWXzzcqBXRPjOHRAFNol7VS9GVLm38Dpz8jt4JdwkZsrJWKB+fJx7HroeP8+8UrN8T4sYTZRumEZeG0qsmmSQQqMVjTbgORhACJFb98sNxf97SkKsCkbLmSQTeZXM1kO0QbCl9UmXqjvz0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784885396; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QbAX5r8MEL2GQOGVwCggevPWa8EXFUAaN0SPjjSlzW4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=QBK/pAEWdKYes4B2KsufJoHmb+FlkjllVEINJ62sp/OumhvK5pwHL/UgRkyJPwcX6EcNMUy+ivlrZ3CDGKXuFYhvIBWEP2iCytZBqACnWjfFSeHJW5JLRiHifbiidfGl96DMU3ZEoaFoynzFssAXXXTZvAivzx/m3K6ngBsmJ6c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.b=ta/dGQ1m; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.b="ta/dGQ1m" X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.80 with qID 66O9TfpuE1099265, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=realtek.com; s=dkim; t=1784885381; bh=QbAX5r8MEL2GQOGVwCggevPWa8EXFUAaN0SPjjSlzW4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=ta/dGQ1m6xCimi7x9WLy9fUwdQwZptl7RLdSNvamC5zXzf+ksLiI0CgXiktyP2eRK LOcq6K+GpWaGDUH2ykGynHnB2SxZL61d2PKR9QdffiB120RPAQVaKj/B6DRpKbQvsQ X0K49RJRiG8Qbz7C3HEtnb/2FYxBxLujCTz1wk+oKy7DATAEj5LEJkmNhn17gQks4l Jv+EeJnRhTs7k9Hz9A4yLI296DpsQLOpKv+/U2nad4Omx8DzDWFucDvEBcvVk4OOtH wGr4qGEiwAg0cEROclBB1Ru2tU6KoZ68u0FLYvDGXKL65FtfQVb4qsLp6f9ZYn49tY gITC5G7nzK+8A== Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtkexhmbs04.realtek.com.tw[10.21.1.54]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/3.29/5.94) with ESMTPS id 66O9TfpuE1099265 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:29:41 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.56) by RTKEXHMBS04.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.17; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:29:41 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([::1]) by RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::e6fd:5a3f:8946:92c4%10]) with mapi id 15.02.2562.017; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:29:41 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: "luka.gejak@linux.dev" CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael Straube" , Peter Robinson , Bitterblue Smith Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] wifi: rtw88: 8723bs: add the core handling required by RTL8723BS Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 1/4] wifi: rtw88: 8723bs: add the core handling required by RTL8723BS Thread-Index: AQHdGhVIJ3zQKvQe4kuuvRh5AuZE7LZ8Y82g Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:29:41 +0000 Message-ID: <47e555f89dce4a0997e19d7ba753dbb5@realtek.com> References: <20260722200337.135150-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev> <20260722200337.135150-2-luka.gejak@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20260722200337.135150-2-luka.gejak@linux.dev> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW Content-Language: zh-TW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 luka.gejak@linux.dev wrote: > From: Luka Gejak >=20 > Several of those need explaining, because the reason is not visible in > the code: >=20 It seems like you misunderstood what I meant. You should add each necessary functions by individual patch. Don't mix them.=20 (Sorry, I'd reply the cover letter you wrote next week.) If you consider these all are necessary, send preparations as first patchse= t, and start to add RTL8723BS by second patchset. With a large patchset, I can= 't respond quickly. Ping-Ke