Re: RaLink RT2500 802.11g Cardbus/mini-PCI

["Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]

Ivo van Doorn schrieb:
>>> No, wait, I'm confused, the original patch is correct. As far as I can
>>> tell, the code there is correct. The bug in that code was actually
>>> introduced by me based on the wrong thinking I just did again.
>> I figured as much from the original commit message. So rt2500pci works 
>> properly when the use_short_preamble has the wrong value, and breaks 
>> when it has the right one.
>> By the way, 2.6.25-rc8 was the first time that rt2500pci was ever fast 
>> enough to be usable at all for me, so the bug you introduced seemed to 
>> be the fix for my speed problems (which is odd). My guess is that 
>> rt2500pci treats use_short_preamble wrong.
> 
> Could you test this with the below patch?
> This enables short_preamble for all rt2x00 drivers regardless of what mac80211 issues.

What tree is this against? It doesn't apply to linux-2.6.git 
(2.6.25-rc9), which was the one I was talking about all the time. I did 
not test the wireless-testing or rt2x00 tree.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]