linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Gautam Iyer <gi1242@stanford.edu>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: b43 reduced performance in Linux-2.6.25
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:34:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4817A28E.2050309@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080429215629.GC17790@stanford.edu>

Gautam Iyer wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I saw a few threads about reduced performance in b43 in the 2.6.24 /
> 2.6.25_rcXX kernels, but couldn't manage to fix the problem myself:
> 
> On my system, using ndiswrapper and the windows drivers gives me about
> 1.5 times the performance of the in kernel b43 drivers.
> 
> Here are my system specs:
> 
>     Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11a/b/g [14e4:4312] (rev 02)
>     Linux 2.6.25 (gentoo-sources-2.6.25-r1).
>     b43 wireless driver with firmware 410.2160 (2007-05-26 15:32:10)
> 
> I measured the performance by running "ttcp" between my Laptop and my
> router. Using b43 on my Laptop gives about 2MB/s reported, and using
> ndiswrapper gives me about 3MB/s under exactly the same situations.
> 
> Any ideas about what's going on? (I would be happy to provide you with
> any further specs on my computer).

Yes. Broadcom wrote the Windows drivers, but never gave the specifications to 
anyone else. Obvious those specs from their engineers are better than those 
from the _reverse_ engineers for your card. On my BCM4311/2 I get better 
throughput with the b43 driver than I get when running Windows. I _NEVER_ use 
ndiswrapper. Now that b43 works, why would I want to taint my kernel?

The only loss of performance that we look at is those that happen between 
release n and n+1. Those we call regressions and take them seriously.

The only specs that we are interested in are those that come from reverse 
engineering. If you can provide them, we are very interested.

Larry

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-29 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-29 21:56 b43 reduced performance in Linux-2.6.25 Gautam Iyer
2008-04-29 22:34 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2008-04-29 23:30   ` Gautam Iyer
2008-04-29 23:54     ` Larry Finger
2008-04-30  1:05       ` b43 LED status (was Re: b43 reduced performance in Linux-2.6.25) Gautam Iyer
2008-04-30  3:05         ` Larry Finger
2008-04-30  7:41           ` b43 LED status Gautam Iyer
2008-04-30 18:00   ` b43 reduced performance in Linux-2.6.25 Gautam Iyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4817A28E.2050309@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=gi1242@stanford.edu \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).