From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
dhowells@redhat.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, mb@bu3sch.de,
stefano.brivio@polimi.it,
Broadcom Linux <bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de>,
wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + drivers-net-wireless-b43legacy-dmac-remove-the-switch-in-b43legacy_dma_init.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:56:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <486BB332.6000703@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807020835.m628Zx2e007473@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> The patch titled
> drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c: remove the switch in b43legacy_dma_init()
> has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> drivers-net-wireless-b43legacy-dmac-remove-the-switch-in-b43legacy_dma_init.patch
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c: remove the switch in b43legacy_dma_init()
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
>
> The gcc 3.4 fork used to compile the MN10300 port emits unwanted
> __ucmpdi2() calls for this switch on a 64bit value.
>
> Fix it by transforming the switch to equivalent "if ... else if ..."
> statements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it>
> Cc: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
> Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c~drivers-net-wireless-b43legacy-dmac-remove-the-switch-in-b43legacy_dma_init drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c~drivers-net-wireless-b43legacy-dmac-remove-the-switch-in-b43legacy_dma_init
> +++ a/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
> @@ -1027,19 +1027,15 @@ int b43legacy_dma_init(struct b43legacy_
> enum b43legacy_dmatype type;
>
> dmamask = supported_dma_mask(dev);
> - switch (dmamask) {
> - default:
> - B43legacy_WARN_ON(1);
> - case DMA_30BIT_MASK:
> +
> + if (dmamask == DMA_30BIT_MASK)
> type = B43legacy_DMA_30BIT;
> - break;
> - case DMA_32BIT_MASK:
> + else if (dmamask == DMA_32BIT_MASK)
> type = B43legacy_DMA_32BIT;
> - break;
> - case DMA_64BIT_MASK:
> + else if (dmamask == DMA_64BIT_MASK)
> type = B43legacy_DMA_64BIT;
> - break;
> - }
> + else
> + B43legacy_WARN_ON(1);
>
> err = ssb_dma_set_mask(dev->dev, dmamask);
> if (err) {
> _
Andrew,
When I received your E-mail, I wondered why there was not a similar
"fix" for b43. It was then I discovered how much b43 and b43legacy had
diverged while I wasn't looking. I have no objections to your patch;
however, I wonder if it might be better to fix b43legacy in the same
way that b43 was changed. I have prepared and tested such a fix (shown
below). The only problem with this is that the patch is much more
intrusive than Adrian's and there may be a problem getting it into
2.6.26 before it is released, but then I do not think that you intend to
send the -mm patch to 2.6.26.
What do you think is the best route to go?
Larry
=================================================
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c
@@ -860,6 +860,18 @@ static u64 supported_dma_mask(struct b43
return DMA_30BIT_MASK;
}
+static enum b43legacy_dmatype dma_mask_to_engine_type(u64 dmamask)
+{
+ if (dmamask == DMA_30BIT_MASK)
+ return B43legacy_DMA_30BIT;
+ if (dmamask == DMA_32BIT_MASK)
+ return B43legacy_DMA_32BIT;
+ if (dmamask == DMA_64BIT_MASK)
+ return B43legacy_DMA_64BIT;
+ B43legacy_WARN_ON(1);
+ return B43legacy_DMA_30BIT;
+}
+
/* Main initialization function. */
static
struct b43legacy_dmaring *b43legacy_setup_dmaring(struct b43legacy_wldev *dev,
@@ -1019,6 +1031,43 @@ void b43legacy_dma_free(struct b43legacy
dma->tx_ring0 = NULL;
}
+static int b43legacy_dma_set_mask(struct b43legacy_wldev *dev, u64 mask)
+{
+ u64 orig_mask = mask;
+ bool fallback = 0;
+ int err;
+
+ /* Try to set the DMA mask. If it fails, try falling back to a
+ * lower mask, as we can always also support a lower one. */
+ while (1) {
+ err = ssb_dma_set_mask(dev->dev, mask);
+ if (!err)
+ break;
+ if (mask == DMA_64BIT_MASK) {
+ mask = DMA_32BIT_MASK;
+ fallback = 1;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (mask == DMA_32BIT_MASK) {
+ mask = DMA_30BIT_MASK;
+ fallback = 1;
+ continue;
+ }
+ b43legacyerr(dev->wl, "The machine/kernel does not support "
+ "the required %u-bit DMA mask\n",
+ (unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(orig_mask));
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+ if (fallback) {
+ b43legacyinfo(dev->wl, "DMA mask fallback from %u-bit to %u-"
+ "bit\n",
+ (unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(orig_mask),
+ (unsigned int)dma_mask_to_engine_type(mask));
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int b43legacy_dma_init(struct b43legacy_wldev *dev)
{
struct b43legacy_dma *dma = &dev->dma;
@@ -1028,21 +1077,8 @@ int b43legacy_dma_init(struct b43legacy_
enum b43legacy_dmatype type;
dmamask = supported_dma_mask(dev);
- switch (dmamask) {
- default:
- B43legacy_WARN_ON(1);
- case DMA_30BIT_MASK:
- type = B43legacy_DMA_30BIT;
- break;
- case DMA_32BIT_MASK:
- type = B43legacy_DMA_32BIT;
- break;
- case DMA_64BIT_MASK:
- type = B43legacy_DMA_64BIT;
- break;
- }
-
- err = ssb_dma_set_mask(dev->dev, dmamask);
+ type = dma_mask_to_engine_type(dmamask);
+ err = b43legacy_dma_set_mask(dev, dmamask);
if (err) {
#ifdef CONFIG_B43LEGACY_PIO
b43legacywarn(dev->wl, "DMA for this device not supported. "
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-02 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200807020835.m628Zx2e007473@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-02 16:56 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2008-07-02 17:16 ` + drivers-net-wireless-b43legacy-dmac-remove-the-switch-in-b43legacy_dma_init.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton
2008-07-02 21:03 ` Michael Buesch
2008-07-02 21:03 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=486BB332.6000703@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=stefano.brivio@polimi.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).