From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.94]:31850 "HELO smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751470AbYGISeM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:34:12 -0400 Message-ID: <48750494.8010802@sbcglobal.net> (sfid-20080709_203415_902309_431735E2) Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:33:56 -0700 From: Bryan Batten MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivo van Doorn CC: linux-wireless , linville@tuxdriver.com, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] [PATCH] rt2x00: Fix NULL pointer error in adhoc/master mode References: <200807051511.57995.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200807052042.47008.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <4874FC95.3050904@sbcglobal.net> <200807092029.10007.IvDoorn@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200807092029.10007.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ivo van Doorn wrote: ... > Yes, but if you look again you see that the legacy driver does > define it, and even includes the description of bits 9 -> 19 And > the legacy driver source code has always been more reliable then > the datasheet, so I would put my money on the code. ;) I know. But I suspect that in this case, the datasheet just *may* be correct. >> Would it be possible to verify with Ralink that this is not a >> typo in the RT2500 datasheet? > > I'll see what I can find out. > Thanks, -- Bryan - "Beyond the point of no return, there's no going back." Narration to "Mars Rising" on the Science Channel