linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>,
	orinoco-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Orinoco-devel] Agere PCMCIA sometimes takes very long time to associate with 9.48 FW
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:01:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <491FEF89.3040100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081115145655.GB31553@tuxdriver.com>

John W. Linville wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:15:47AM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> 
>> - we should not be doing it in ->open. It is technically legal to set
>> wireless parameters before "icfonfig up" and we lose all of them. I will
>> try next week with similar patch in orinoco_stop().
> 
> That seems wrong...
> 
>> - I am still not even sure we should do it at all. What is sematic of
>> ifconfig up/down w.r.t. wireless parameters? I.e. is "ifconfig down"
>> expected to clean all device state and start from scratch?
> 
> No.  Unfortunately, it is mostly a matter of opinion as to what
> wireless extensions expects.

Agreed with all the above. I'll discard the driver patch.

There are two other things I can think of:

1. make sure wpa_supplicant is shut down before ifconfig ethX down, and
restart it on resume.

>From the data you've provided it looks like your distribution brings the
device down, but may leave wpa_supplicant running. I've noticed that
every time wpa_supplicant shuts down it removes most configuration
settings. Or has that changed?

2. Does the driver need to send a dissociation event (or something) to
userspace on ifconfig down?



Dave.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-16 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200810191436.13298.arvidjaar@mail.ru>
     [not found] ` <491349BC.8090606@gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <49134F66.4020608@gmail.com>
2008-11-15  8:15     ` [Orinoco-devel] Agere PCMCIA sometimes takes very long time to associate with 9.48 FW Andrey Borzenkov
2008-11-15 14:56       ` John W. Linville
2008-11-16 10:01         ` Dave [this message]
2008-11-17 15:50           ` Dan Williams
2008-11-17 19:37             ` Dave
2008-11-17 19:29           ` Andrey Borzenkov
2008-11-17 20:37             ` Dave
2008-11-22  7:56               ` Andrey Borzenkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=491FEF89.3040100@gmail.com \
    --to=kilroyd@googlemail.com \
    --cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=orinoco-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).