Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Rate setting problem with pid algorithm for (at least) p54usb and b43
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:06:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4920994B.3090600@lwfinger.net> (raw)

Johannes,

In testing today, I discovered that p54usb and b43 never advance beyond 1 Mb/s
when using the pid algorithm. When I monitored rc_pid_events in
/sys/kernel/debug/.../, I discovered the rate-setting details as follows:

3547 4302748627 pf_sample 12800 -9216 -9216 0

IIRC from debugging b43legacy in the past, this indicates that the pid code is
never seeing any successful transmissions. I debugged the code in
rate_control_pid_tx_status() and found that p54usb is passing 1 in
status.rates[0].count, thus the following fragment is handling each frame as
though it had retries, even though there were none:

        /* We count frames that totally failed to be transmitted as two bad
         * frames, those that made it out but had some retries as one good and
         * one bad frame. */
        if (!(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK)) {
                spinfo->tx_num_failed += 2;
                spinfo->tx_num_xmit++;
        } else if (info->status.rates[0].count) {
                spinfo->tx_num_failed++;
                spinfo->tx_num_xmit++;
        }

This is a regression introduced in commit 9ea2c74 "mac80211/drivers: rewrite the
rate control API".

The following patch fixes the problem. Is it right?

Index: wireless-testing/net/mac80211/rc80211_pid_algo.c
===================================================================
--- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/rc80211_pid_algo.c
+++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/rc80211_pid_algo.c
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static void rate_control_pid_tx_status(v
        if (!(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK)) {
                spinfo->tx_num_failed += 2;
                spinfo->tx_num_xmit++;
-       } else if (info->status.rates[0].count) {
+       } else if (info->status.rates[0].count > 1) {
                spinfo->tx_num_failed++;
                spinfo->tx_num_xmit++;
        }

Larry

             reply	other threads:[~2008-11-16 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-16 22:06 Larry Finger [this message]
2008-11-16 22:16 ` Rate setting problem with pid algorithm for (at least) p54usb and b43 Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4920994B.3090600@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox