linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* rt2500usb vs rt73usb
@ 2008-12-28  6:35 Piter PUNK
  2008-12-28  9:34 ` Ivo van Doorn
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Piter PUNK @ 2008-12-28  6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-wireless


Hi,

I have three rt2573 wireless devices:

. TP-Link WN321G
. D-Link DWA-110
. Built-in inside Intel ClassmatePC

The D-Link device loads only the rt73usb module and
works really fine. The other two loads rt73usb AND
rt2500usb. The correct module for all is rt73usb.

Loading rt2500usb AND rt73usb don't have any functional
problem. All wireless devices works fine. But is very
annoying the additional modules loaded.

Both modules are loaded because both handle 148f:2573
devices. Of course my universe is very small, only two
devices, but... devices 148f:2573 that works with
rt2500usb exists? Those devices can work with rt73usb?

If the those 148f:2573 USB devices doesn't exists or
if they exists and works fine with rt73usb, can we
remove 148f:2573 from rt2500usb?

Thanks!

Piter Punk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-06 20:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-28  6:35 rt2500usb vs rt73usb Piter PUNK
2008-12-28  9:34 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-12-28 22:14   ` Pavel Roskin
2008-12-28 22:32     ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-12-28 22:44       ` Luis Correia
2009-01-06 20:27     ` John W. Linville

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).