linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@kpnplanet.nl>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
	Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: Provide regulatory hint with rt2500pci/usb
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:50:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4963E034.6000606@kpnplanet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890901061423o1b2c84b6q38f791408b2ad9d9@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/06/09 23:23, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Gertjan van Wingerde
> <gwingerde@kpnplanet.nl>  wrote:
>    
>> On 01/06/09 21:47, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>      
>>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:32:47PM -0800, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> On 01/06/09 00:45, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 02:21:46PM -0800, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> On Monday 05 January 2009, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>>>> On 01/05/09 21:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem isn't there for the bits that Ivo sent, as the rt2500
>>>>>>> devices don't support the a band.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>> For rt2500pci and rt2500usb there are chipsets which support 5GHz (they
>>>>>> are rare, but they do exist),
>>>>>> comments for the Ralink drivers indicate they simply didn't add the
>>>>>> regulatory domain definitions yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>> Based on the documentation from the EEPROM for all devices I read that
>>>>> its recommended
>>>>> that the EEPROM *not be relied on for the regulatory domain*, instead it
>>>>> recommends the
>>>>> windows registry be used.
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on tests for the devices with only one band, do are you seeing an
>>>>> actual regulatory
>>>>> domain in the EEPROM?
>>>>>
>>>>> To deal with the issue of having two separate EEPROM values for a
>>>>> regulatory domain
>>>>> and since the documentation indicates to not rely on it I would advise
>>>>> to allow users
>>>>> to be compliant by selecting the country they are in. wpa_supplicant has
>>>>> support for
>>>>> selecting country now, and so does iw. Eventually I see Network Manager
>>>>> letting users
>>>>> select the country. But you guys are the maintainers and developers so
>>>>> you will know
>>>>> better.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> My tests indicate that there are devices out there that have this
>>>> information set in the EEPROM. Based on tests with my own patch, and my
>>>> own devices, I have been able to determine the following:
>>>>
>>>> 1. rt2400pci -->   don't know, don't own a rt2400pci device.
>>>> 2. rt2500pci -->   don't know, don't own a rt2500pci device anymore.
>>>> 3. rt2500usb -->   my e-tech device (not sure which type; the device
>>>> doesn't say it) has an actual domain set for the bg band.
>>>> 4. rt61pci -->   my Sitecom WL151 device does not contain actual domain
>>>> information.
>>>> 5. rt73usb -->   my Sitecom WL113-002 device does contain actual domain
>>>> information, and the codes for the bg band and a band are the same.
>>>> 6. rt2800pci -->   my Sitecom WL182 device does contain actual domain
>>>> information, and the codes for the bg band and a band are the same.
>>>> 7. rt2800usb -->   my Sitecom WL181 device does contain actual domain
>>>> information, and the codes for the bg band and a band are the same.
>>>>
>>>> So, there are devices out there that do contain "meaningful" regulatory
>>>> information.
>>>>
>>>> Luis, the definitions for the a-band EEPROM codes only give the channel
>>>> numbers, it doesn't indicate a real "country". Is there any way we can
>>>> check whether these sets of channels are actually consistent with the
>>>> regulations of specific countries?
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> You can help contribute to the wireless-regdb and check that the valid
>>> channels apply there.
>>>
>>>        
>> Well, the trouble I'm having is to match the allowed values and channels
>> against the regdb, to see to which countries each of the values map, if any.
>> I'm a bit illiterate on channel assignments etc., so I don't know how to do
>> the math from channel number to frequency, and all the other stuff that is
>> in the regdb.
>>      
>
> Look at net/wireless/util.c ieee80211_channel_to_frequency() for how
> to do this. If all you have is channel maps then just focus on that
> then.
>    

OK. Will have a look at that. This will have to wait until the weekend 
tho (need to travel for work for the rest of the week).

---
Gertjan.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-06 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-04 19:21 [PATCH] rt2x00: Provide regulatory hint with rt2500pci/usb Ivo van Doorn
2009-01-05 20:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-05 21:29   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-01-05 22:21     ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-01-05 23:45       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-06 17:32         ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-01-06 17:36           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-06 17:47             ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-01-06 20:39               ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-01-06 20:49                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-06 21:51                   ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-01-06 22:11                     ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-01-13 22:07                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-06 20:32         ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-01-06 20:47           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-06 22:15             ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-01-06 22:23               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-01-06 22:50                 ` Gertjan van Wingerde [this message]
2009-01-06 20:17       ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-01-06 21:52         ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-01-06 22:06           ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2009-01-06 22:12             ` Ivo van Doorn
2009-01-06 22:17             ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4963E034.6000606@kpnplanet.nl \
    --to=gwingerde@kpnplanet.nl \
    --cc=Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).