From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f30.google.com ([209.85.219.30]:43462 "EHLO mail-ew0-f30.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753432AbZATWW1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:22:27 -0500 Received: by ewy11 with SMTP id 11so27986ewy.13 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:22:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49763FA5.7040101@gmail.com> (sfid-20090120_232232_042860_6ABC8B95) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:18:29 +0100 From: Artur Skawina MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Lamparter CC: Artur Skawina , Johannes Berg , Larry Finger , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: wireless-testing, p54 and sinus 154 data no longer works References: <494698AF.4020204@gmail.com> <200901200032.42202.chunkeey@web.de> <497631A8.9030903@gmail.com> <200901202150.17233.chunkeey@web.de> In-Reply-To: <200901202150.17233.chunkeey@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christian Lamparter wrote: > > So, p54usb first generation needs the ZERO_PACKET flag as well? > (e.g a patch like the attached p54usb-net2280-zeropacket.diff ?) yes, the client would often not even associate w/o that flag in the int urb. artur