From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: ieee80211_regdom module parameter for cfg80211
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:38:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <499C8DD2.7000800@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090218220531.GD4246@tesla>
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:31:52PM -0800, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 15:29 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>>> On at least one forum, I have seen the recommendation that a user set their
>>> regulatory domain by creating the file /etc/modprobe.d/cfg80211 with the
>>> contents "ieee80211_regdom=US".
>>>
>>> That works as long as CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY is set in their .config,
>>> but will fail if it is not.
>>>
>>> Should the module_param statement be moved outside the ifdef
>>> CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD...? Setting the module parameter that way might not make any
>>> sense, but it surely shouldn't kill wireless.
>> I actually see no reason to not just /honour/ it by calling crda with
>> its parameter if CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY isn't set.
>
> The idea was that things we want to get rid of will go in OLD_REG. Static regdoms
> for US, JP and EU fall into that and so does the module parameter. I believe
> it is silly to keep the module parameter around as we already have userspace
> APIs to let users set this.
I guess we leave it the way it is. At least the only people that will get caught
are those that upgrade their distro. A clean install should redo the /etc/...
tree and do away with such modifications.
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-18 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-18 21:29 ieee80211_regdom module parameter for cfg80211 Larry Finger
2009-02-18 21:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-18 22:05 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-18 22:34 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-02-18 22:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-18 22:38 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2009-02-18 22:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-20 19:45 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-02-20 20:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-20 21:07 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-02-20 23:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-21 15:31 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-02-23 17:51 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-23 20:33 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-02-23 21:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-23 21:36 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-02-23 23:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=499C8DD2.7000800@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).