Re: [RFC] zd1211rw: remove zd_addr_t typedef for a simple u16

[Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>]

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> It would seem to make the code cleaner and more legible but it just fixed a
> sparse warning for me. Unfortunately I don't have an old zydas hardware to
> test it with too though.

The line in question:
	if (int_num == CR_INTERRUPT) {

The usage of CR_INTERRUPT wrong here; in this specific case, we are not 
looking to match a register address. It's a separate constant which is 
also treated separately from register addresses in the zydas documentation.

CR_INTERRUPT should be replaced with 0x9510, or perhaps a new constant e.g.
#define INTR_STS1_MAC_INTERRUPT 0x9510

I'm afraid that I don't have any hardware here to test with either, but 
the above change should be safe enough to go through without testing.

Thanks,
Daniel