From: Richard Farina <sidhayn@gmail.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: iw error message enhancement request
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:02:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CD30D8.9070403@gmail.com> (raw)
I was just trying to support a user in the irc channel with the
following error:
14:14 < ~incastrix-hl> Zero_Chaos: receive a strange message after: iw
phy phy0 interface add wlan11 type ap
14:14 < ~incastrix-hl> Zero_Chaos: http://wireless.kernel.org/RTFM-AP
In case you read that like I did, you read it wrong, let me explain better:
Kid src # iw phy phy0 interface add wlan12 type ap
See http://wireless.kernel.org/RTFM-AP.
Yes, you read that right, when you try to use iw to create a master/ap
mode interface it gives NO ERROR, NO EXPLAINATION, and refers you to a
web page (which doesn't even mention this error mind you). This doesn't
make any sense at all. There are two rational solutions:
1.) Use a meaningful error message such as "Hostapd is required for
master mode: please see http://wireless.kernel.org/RTFM-AP"
2.) Remove the option to make a master mode interface from iw
completely. Since iw doesn't have the ability to set master mode this
is a completely pointless option. It's like adding an option to ping
like "ping -irssi freeenode.net" which outputs "See http://www.irssi.org".
I favor option 1 because iw is the obvious place where people will be
looking to set master mode so having a useful error message there is
needed in my opinion. The likelyhood for someone to try and set master
mode from iw IMHO negates the arguement I make in option 2, but I wanted
to present both logical options.
Either way, what is in iw right now is aweful. Not only does it not
explain what is going on with that error message, but the website
doesn't even mention the problem. Additionally, presuming that someone
has internet when they are running iw isn't a safe assumption at all.
Maybe I have no internet and I want to bring up an AP to play a LAN game
with friends? Or any number of other reasons to bring up an AP without
internet. Please folks, this is just sloppy.
-Rick Farina
reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49CD30D8.9070403@gmail.com \
--to=sidhayn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).