linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Another regression in 2.6.30-rc1
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:37:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DE1638.8060906@lwfinger.net> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1994 bytes --]

If you are implementing kernel 2.6.30-rc1 from wireless-testing, there is a
regression that will hit you if you have the ACPI battery routines enabled. The
symptom is an oops on boot with the line "> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
pointer dereference at (null)". The patch for this, which comes from
2.6.30-rc1-git1 in Linus's tree, is as follows:

==============================================

commit 5d38258ec026921a7b266f4047ebeaa75db358e5
Author: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 7 10:55:38 2009 +0200

    ACPI battery: fix async boot oops

    > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)

    What happens is that the battery module's init sections are being freed
    before the async callback (which was marked __init) has run. This theory
    is supported by the fact that the bad RIP value is a vmalloc address.

    The immediate fix is to make this a non-init call.

    (A better long-term fix is of course to wait with init-section unloading
    until a module's async initcalls have been run, which would allow us to
    discard this function which is still only run once, after all. Perhaps a
    new async_initcall() function for the async/module API, if this is needed
    for other modules in the future?)

    Reported-by: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
    Tested-by: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com>
    Tested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
    Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index b0de631..3c7d894 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_battery_driver = {
 		},
 };

-static void __init acpi_battery_init_async(void *unused, async_cookie_t cookie)
+static void acpi_battery_init_async(void *unused, async_cookie_t cookie)
 {
 	if (acpi_disabled)
 		return;


----

Larry

[-- Attachment #2: battery_init_async --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1602 bytes --]

commit 5d38258ec026921a7b266f4047ebeaa75db358e5
Author: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 7 10:55:38 2009 +0200

    ACPI battery: fix async boot oops
    
    > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
    
    What happens is that the battery module's init sections are being freed
    before the async callback (which was marked __init) has run. This theory
    is supported by the fact that the bad RIP value is a vmalloc address.
    
    The immediate fix is to make this a non-init call.
    
    (A better long-term fix is of course to wait with init-section unloading
    until a module's async initcalls have been run, which would allow us to
    discard this function which is still only run once, after all. Perhaps a
    new async_initcall() function for the async/module API, if this is needed
    for other modules in the future?)
    
    Reported-by: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
    Tested-by: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com>
    Tested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
    Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index b0de631..3c7d894 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_battery_driver = {
 		},
 };
 
-static void __init acpi_battery_init_async(void *unused, async_cookie_t cookie)
+static void acpi_battery_init_async(void *unused, async_cookie_t cookie)
 {
 	if (acpi_disabled)
 		return;


             reply	other threads:[~2009-04-09 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-09 15:37 Larry Finger [this message]
2009-04-10  4:34 ` Another regression in 2.6.30-rc1 Kalle Valo
2009-04-10  4:59   ` Larry Finger
2009-04-10  5:13     ` Sedat Dilek
2009-04-10  5:19       ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DE1638.8060906@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).