From: Will Keaney <keaneyw@gmail.com>
To: Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Trouble Associating with ath5k on AR5212]
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:02:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E8E046.2070004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49DCE23B.7010400@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2231 bytes --]
Will Keaney wrote:
> Will Keaney wrote:
>
>> Bob Copeland wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> I also have to manually set the reg domain to US every time I load the
>>>> ath5k module. �I tried configuring wpa_supplicant.conf to do this
>>>> itself, but that doesn't seem to work. �It would be nice to have a
>>>> module parameter for setting this at load time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I may be wrong but I think that only works in wpa_supplicant if you
>>> use -Dnl80211 (instead of -Dwext).
>>>
>>> FWIW in the default world roaming domain you can still connect to most
>>> APs. Besides iw/wpa_supplicant, pending patches to ath5k will set the
>>> default regdomain automatically based on the value stored in the eeprom.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ahh, interesting. I didn't see nl80211 documented in the wpa_supplicant
>> example configs or man page. I'll give that a shot.
>> I seem to get much better scanning results with the region set properly,
>> than on the world roaming domain.
>>
>>
> I don't know if it's relevant or not, but when using -Dnl80211 I see a
> bit of odd behavior:
> - wpa_supplicant is able to set the region automatically. Yay!
> - scanning produces quite an extensive list of APs, but most of them
> don't have SSIDs listed. This isn't in itself too strange, since I know
> that there are 2 networks nearby each with several repeaters that do not
> broadcast SSID. However, one of them (chmc_guest) is identified in the
> scanning output when using -Dwext.
> - All of the networks show a signal strength of 0. -Dwext shows varying
> signal strengths for each network. Considering that I am unable to
> associate with any of them, I have to wonder which driver is producing
> spurious output.
>
> I would also like to note that the maximum Tx Power of the card is
> significantly different between madwifi and ath5k. In madwifi, it maxes
> at 17dBm; in ath5k, it maxes at 27dBm. I don't know if it actually is
> using these values, or if one or both drivers are reporting Tx power
> incorrectly.
>
> Will
>
Is there any other information or testing I can provide to assist with
diagnosing/resolving this?
Will
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 261 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-17 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 13:38 [Fwd: Re: Trouble Associating with ath5k on AR5212] Will Keaney
2009-04-08 14:58 ` Bob Copeland
2009-04-08 15:44 ` Will Keaney
2009-04-08 16:20 ` Bob Copeland
2009-04-08 16:27 ` Will Keaney
2009-04-08 17:43 ` Will Keaney
2009-04-17 20:02 ` Will Keaney [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-03 11:47 Will Keaney
2009-04-03 11:46 Will Keaney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E8E046.2070004@gmail.com \
--to=keaneyw@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).