From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rfkill rewrite bug
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:42:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49EA10F3.3070309@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240057470.4755.7.camel@johannes.local>
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 10:43 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>
>
>>>> When I looked at the code earlier, I saw no obvious replacement for
>>>> rfkill_set_default(). So I tried disabling the wireless and rebooting
>>>> to see what happened. It didn't like that :-).
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ok that wasn't too hard -- try this on top if you get a chance:
>>>
>>>
>> Great, that fixes the crash.
>>
>>
>> 1) I think we need to add a resume method to eeepc-laptop.
>>
>> Without this, funny things happen when I hibernate, disable wireless in
>> the BIOS, and resume:
>>
>> ath5k phy0: failed to wake up the MAC chip
>>
>> It's an really stupid thing to do, but it can happen. It's bad from a
>> UI point of view. E.g. in network-manager, you can see a "wlan0"
>> device, but it doesn't work.
>>
>> The EEE rfkill is unusual in that it hotplugs the PCI device, making
>> eeepc-laptop something like a custom pci hotplug driver. With your
>> rewrite, eeepc-laptop doesn't notice the state change on resume.
>> Previously, the rfkill-core would restore the pre-hibernation state,
>> which would sort everything out. I don't think anything else does this,
>> so we can just add a resume method to eeepc-laptop. The resume method
>> would re-check the state and do the PCI hotplug dance if necessary.
>>
>> If you agree, I can do the patch for this and send it to you.
>>
>
> Sounds good to me, yeah.
>
> I could make the rfkill core do that at resume, but I'm not really sure
> it's what we want -- there are too many cases imho:
> * hard rfkill might have changed
> * soft rfkill might still be ok in hw
> * soft rfkill might need reconfiguring
> etc. I think generally it's saner to let the driver sort it out -- it
> can always ask for the current state by using set_hw_state() or so.
>
>
>> 2) Do you have any thoughts about an rfkill_set_default() equivalent?
>> AFAICS your current patch simply removes it.
>>
>> This means that when I boot linux, it doesn't respect the previous
>> rfkill state. I can no longer disable the wireless in the BIOS setup
>> screen, and the rfkill state won't be preserved over reboots.
>>
>> I don't have a strong feeling about reboots _on their own_. But I would
>> be annoyed if the option in the BIOS setup screen stopped working in a
>> future version of linux. Admittedly it's only a matter of principle /
>> nostalgia - since the eeepc-laptop was fixed to implement rfkill
>> properly, I've never used the BIOS option in anger.
>>
>
> That's odd, I thought I added a set_sw_state() to rfkill which would
> disable that rfkill. But there's rfkill_set_global_sw_state() which
> should do what you want -- can you try replacing the EEE set_sw_state
> call with that?
>
> johannes
>
Yes, that fixes it. Now it works the same as the old code which used
rfkill_set_default().
Here's my resume code for eeepc-laptop.
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
index c822bfa..5f594c6 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ static struct key_entry eeepc_keymap[] = {
*/
static int eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device);
static int eeepc_hotk_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
+static int eeepc_hotk_resume(struct acpi_device *device);
static const struct acpi_device_id eeepc_device_ids[] = {
{EEEPC_HOTK_HID, 0},
@@ -191,6 +192,7 @@ static struct acpi_driver eeepc_hotk_driver = {
.ops = {
.add = eeepc_hotk_add,
.remove = eeepc_hotk_remove,
+ .resume = eeepc_hotk_resume
},
};
@@ -495,14 +497,11 @@ static void notify_brn(void)
bd->props.brightness = read_brightness(bd);
}
-static void eeepc_rfkill_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
+static void eeepc_rfkill_hotplug()
{
struct pci_dev *dev;
struct pci_bus *bus = pci_find_bus(0, 1);
- if (event != ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK)
- return;
-
if (!bus) {
printk(EEEPC_WARNING "Unable to find PCI bus 1?\n");
return;
@@ -530,6 +529,14 @@ static void eeepc_rfkill_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
}
}
+static void eeepc_rfkill_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
+{
+ if (event != ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK)
+ return;
+
+ eeepc_rfkill_hotplug();
+}
+
static void eeepc_hotk_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
{
static struct key_entry *key;
@@ -695,6 +702,22 @@ static int eeepc_hotk_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
return 0;
}
+static int eeepc_hotk_resume(struct acpi_device *device)
+{
+ if (ehotk->eeepc_wlan_rfkill) {
+ rfkill_set_sw_state(ehotk->eeepc_wlan_rfkill,
+ get_acpi(CM_ASL_WLAN) != 1);
+
+ eeepc_rfkill_hotplug();
+ }
+
+ if (ehotk->eeepc_bluetooth_rfkill)
+ rfkill_set_sw_state(ehotk->eeepc_bluetooth_rfkill,
+ get_acpi(CM_ASL_BLUETOOTH) != 1);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Hwmon
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-18 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <49DCA88E.6060400@tuffmail.co.uk>
[not found] ` <1239204090.16477.1.camel@johannes.local>
[not found] ` <49DCDD2E.80705@tuffmail.co.uk>
[not found] ` <49E38BBC.5010708@tuffmail.co.uk>
[not found] ` <1239741968.4205.1.camel@johannes.local>
[not found] ` <49E98C86.2040308@tuffmail.co.uk>
[not found] ` <1240043283.5792.0.camel@johannes.local>
2009-04-18 9:43 ` rfkill rewrite bug Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 12:24 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 13:29 ` Rfkill rewrite: eeepc-laptop resume Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 13:33 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 14:02 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 14:10 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 15:49 ` rfkill rewrite bug Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 15:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 17:48 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 17:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 18:03 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 17:42 ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2009-04-18 17:59 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-20 8:33 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-20 8:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-20 9:20 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-20 11:28 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49EA10F3.3070309@tuffmail.co.uk \
--to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).