linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: b43 vs b43legacy
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:17:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A245361.9060807@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A244C5A.50307@free.fr>

matthieu castet wrote:
> Larry Finger wrote:
>> Matthieu CASTET wrote:
>>> what's the difference between b43 and b43legacy ?
>>>
>>> >From a first point a view, it seems b43 is for core >= 5 and
>>> b43legacy for the
>>> other.
>>> There is also firmware difference : b43 need v4 and b43legacy need v3.
>>
>> The firmware difference is the primary one.
>>
>>> But v4 firmware seems to support core 4 (pcm4 & ucode4) and b43 code
>>> got some
>>> support for old chips (<5).
>>
>> The Broadcom V4 drivers do have core 4 firmware embedded in them and
>> it is
>> extracted by b43-fwcutter; however, b43 will _NOT_ work with core 4
>> chips. The
>> firmware loader will only find firmware for core 5 and later.
> Ok but what prevent b43 to support core 4 chip with v4 firmware like the
> broadcom driver does ?
> I am aware that the current driver doesn't support it, but what are the
> missing part to support it ?

The firmware loader code is the first step. Beyond that, I have no idea.

> If it is the difference from core4 from newer chip, why b43legacy
> contains only few special case for core4 chip.

I do not know other than that is what the specs called for.

> PS : I don't have core 4 chip nor plan to get some, I ask this out of
> curiosity.

I do have such a chip, but I use it to verify b43legacy code.

Larry


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-01 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-29 19:19 b43 vs b43legacy Matthieu CASTET
2009-05-29 20:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-29 21:15 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-01 21:47   ` matthieu castet
2009-06-01 22:17     ` Larry Finger [this message]
2009-06-02 15:17     ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-08 19:43       ` matthieu castet
2009-05-30  8:58 ` Michael Buesch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A245361.9060807@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).