From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT 3/3] b43/legacy: port to cfg80211 rfkill
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:59:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2592C5.10803@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243973487.7176.1.camel@johannes.local>
Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> Me neither, so I really need somebody to test this... I suspect there
> will be problems when the device is set down because of rfkill, and then
> we can no longer poll the rfkill hw state? But that might have been a
> problem before too, since if my suspicion is right we could never do:
> * hw rfkill
> * set if down
> * hw un-rfkill
> * set if up
>
> and have it show the events to userspace as expected, or something...
I'm trying to test, but I get an oops on boot. I'm still tracking it
and I lose the reason off the top of the screen, but the trace is:
queue_work + 0x1a
schedule_work + 0x16
rfkill_resume_polling + 0x23
wiphy_rfkill_start_polling + 0x35 (Line 452 of net/wireless/core.c)
b43_op_start + 0x172 (Line 4336 of drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c)
The offsets are appropriate for wireless-testing and x86_64. The line
in b43_op_start is the one just before the mutex_unlock.
Is it possible that we reached this point without hw->wiphy being set?
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-02 11:10 [RFT 0/3] driver rfkill to cfg80211 ports Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 11:10 ` [RFT 1/3] iwlwifi: port to cfg80211 rfkill Johannes Berg
2009-06-03 21:12 ` reinette chatre
2009-06-04 9:03 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-04 16:02 ` reinette chatre
2009-06-02 11:10 ` [RFT 2/3] ath9k: " Johannes Berg
2009-06-10 13:20 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-10 13:32 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-10 14:38 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-11 6:52 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-11 9:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-11 9:59 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-11 10:10 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-11 10:39 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-11 10:40 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-02 11:10 ` [RFT 3/3] b43/legacy: " Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 14:41 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-02 20:04 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 20:08 ` Michael Buesch
2009-06-02 20:11 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 20:59 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2009-06-02 21:01 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-02 23:26 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-03 7:52 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2592C5.10803@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).