From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: always init poll delayed work
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:52:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A27DF95.50603@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244040913.4862.8.camel@johannes.local>
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 09:50 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> 2. Much more serious - When the radio kill switch is turned off, the
>> radio is killed just as expected, but it is not restored when the
>> switch is turned on. The only way to restore the radio is to
>> rmmod/insmod b43. Similarly, if the module is loaded with the switch
>> off, it is not possible to turn the radio on. An unload/load resquence
>> is then needed.
>
> I suspected that much. And you can't recover that since you can't set
> the interface UP. This is because polling doesn't work while the
> interface is set down. As I said previously, I think that's previously
> been buggy too, if you did
> 1) hard kill
> 2) set interface down
> 3) hard unkill
>
> then step 3) would not trigger an event to userspace until you set the
> interface up again, afaict.
>
> We probably need to bring up the core to poll it, if possible?
I have not made much progress in sorting this out. When I turn the
switch off, I see RFKILL_STATE in /sys/class/rfkill/rfkill0/uevent go
from unblocked to hw_blocked. It does not change when the switch is
turned on.
I have verified that b43_rfkill_poll(), the polling callback routine
is being executed, but that the hardware bit in the interface is never
being set again. Whichever part of the old rfkill_input code that made
that change seems not to be functioning.
What diagnostics would be helpful?
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-04 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-03 7:55 [PATCH] rfkill: always init poll delayed work Johannes Berg
2009-06-03 14:50 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-03 14:55 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-04 14:52 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2009-06-04 15:12 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-04 15:59 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-04 16:19 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-04 16:28 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-04 16:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-04 16:51 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-04 16:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-04 17:52 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-04 18:02 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-05 13:03 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A27DF95.50603@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).