From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
otus-devel@lists.madwifi-project.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ar9170-fw: Roll-your-own toolchain
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:58:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2AAE4A.6060100@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244310329.17485.15.camel@johannes.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1473 bytes --]
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 19:37 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>>> Yes. With the AP firmware, that is. I don't care about that firmware at
>>> all.
>> I do as it shall upgrade my soft-AP from an oldish rt2500 to this
>> dwa-160 stick.
>
> No, you don't actually need AP software for that. The STA software
> supports most of AP already.
The last statement I read was: "haven't found a way to properly transmit
multicast frames after DTIM". Does this still apply on the new STA
firmware? What is the state of AP mode in the driver source? Just
disabled, some bits missing - or even ready to work?
>
>> Are you at least interested in porting the missing AP bits into the STA
>> version (likely the best long-term approach anyway)? And do you have a
>> rough idea which bits are missing / where to look at?
>
> Yes, that would be the plan. No, I have no idea what's missing. There
> are tools like diff though :)
Yeah:
# diff -up nice-code-1.c nice-code-2.c | manual-filter
...
-rxBBReg = reg_read_PHY(0x1c5960); //*(volatile u32_t*)(0x1c5960); /* 0x1c8960 write only */
+rxBBReg = *(volatile u32_t*)(0x1c5960); /* 0x1c8960 write only */
...
That will be a "nice" job... :)
Another silly question: You wrote that 802.11n works with the firmware,
and I blindly assumed that this of course includes a/b/g. I was right?
My current AP works in g-mode when association with the ar9170 fails...
Thanks so far,
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-06 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-06 17:12 [PATCH 0/2] ar9170-fw: Roll-your-own toolchain Jan Kiszka
2009-06-06 17:20 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-06 17:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-06 17:28 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-06 17:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-06 17:45 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-06 17:58 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2009-06-06 18:01 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2AAE4A.6060100@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=otus-devel@lists.madwifi-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox