[PATCH 1/4] rfkill: rfkill_set_block() when suspended nitpick

[Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>]

If we return after fiddling with the state, userspace will see the
wrong state and rfkill_set_sw_state() won't work until the next call to
rfkill_set_block().  At the moment rfkill_set_block() will always be
called from rfkill_resume(), but this will change in future.

Also, presumably the point of this test is to avoid bothering devices
which may be suspended.  If we don't want to call set_block(), we
probably don't want to call query() either :-).

Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
---
 net/rfkill/core.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index 4e68ab4..868d79f 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ static void rfkill_set_block(struct rfkill *rfkill, bool blocked)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int err;
 
+	if (unlikely(rfkill->dev.power.power_state.event & PM_EVENT_SLEEP))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Some platforms (...!) generate input events which affect the
 	 * _hard_ kill state -- whenever something tries to change the
@@ -292,9 +295,6 @@ static void rfkill_set_block(struct rfkill *rfkill, bool blocked)
 	rfkill->state |= RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_SETCALL;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rfkill->lock, flags);
 
-	if (unlikely(rfkill->dev.power.power_state.event & PM_EVENT_SLEEP))
-		return;
-
 	err = rfkill->ops->set_block(rfkill->data, blocked);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rfkill->lock, flags);