linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ath9k rfkill behavior
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:56:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A65122B.2040500@highlandsun.com> (raw)

I'm currently running 2.6.31-rc2 and noticed an annoying change in rfkill 
behavior now; I can no longer toggle the state by echoing 0/1 into 
sys/class/rfkill/rfkillX/state, it says write operation not permitted. I 
haven't found any posts online related to this change in behavior, can anyone 
point me to an explanation/rationale? The only way to change the state now 
appears to be by using the wifi toggle switch on the laptop.

This is particularly obnoxious on recent HP Pavilion laptops, because there's 
a single button/LED and it affects both the bluetooth and the wifi 
transmitters. I never use bluetooth and I want that turned off, but I want to 
keep the wifi enabled. I used to be able to do this by explicitly echoing 0 
into the bluetooth rfkill/state but not any more. Even with the bluetooth 
software disabled, powertop shows it's still eating power+cycles on my USB 
controller unless I zero its rfkill state.

Also, when I press the toggle switch, the bluetooth device unregisters itself 
and disappears from the rfkill directory, while the wifi entry remains, but 
its state reads as "2" instead of 0 or 1. When it gets into this state, 
further toggling of the button doesn't reactivate it (though it continues to 
toggle the bluetooth on and off), and a reboot is required to re-enable the 
wifi. What is state "2" ?
-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

             reply	other threads:[~2009-07-21  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-21  0:56 Howard Chu [this message]
2009-07-21 11:27 ` ath9k rfkill behavior Christian Lamparter
2009-07-21 17:21   ` Howard Chu
2009-07-21 21:01   ` Howard Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A65122B.2040500@highlandsun.com \
    --to=hyc@highlandsun.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).