From: "Philip A. Prindeville" <philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
Jon Loeliger <jdl@bigfootnetworks.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CRDA and cross-compilation
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:30:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7B2163.4030805@redfish-solutions.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249580707.14919.29.camel@mj>
Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:56 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> ACK, is it possible to make it simpler?
>
> OK, here's my take.
>
> We only need a native compiler to verify regulatory.bin. I believe it's
> orthogonal to building CRDA.
>
> For someone doing a cross-compilation, it makes no sense to verify the
> installed regulatory.bin. Thus, the verification should be optional.
>
> But the compilation of regdbdump shouldn't be. Firstly, it's installed
> by "make install". Secondly, somebody may want to verify regulatory.bin
> on the target system.
>
> Here's the patch:
>
[snip]
Dumb question but, why not just build a target and host version each of regdumpdb?
-Philip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-06 8:08 CRDA and cross-compilation Philip A. Prindeville
2009-08-06 14:46 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-08-06 16:41 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-08-06 16:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-06 17:38 ` Philip A. Prindeville
2009-08-06 17:45 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-08-06 18:30 ` Philip A. Prindeville [this message]
2009-08-06 18:41 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-08-06 18:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-06 19:08 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-08-06 19:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
[not found] ` <4A7BD15E.1030604@redfish-solutions.com>
[not found] ` <43e72e890908070905s447a2fc0j2dc086048194db34@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4A7CC24D.1000104@redfish-solutions.com>
[not found] ` <1249698462.25983.7.camel@mj>
2009-08-10 22:13 ` [PATCH] " Philip A. Prindeville
2009-08-10 22:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-10 23:55 ` Philip A. Prindeville
2009-08-11 0:25 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-08-11 0:41 ` Philip A. Prindeville
2009-08-11 5:52 ` Philip A. Prindeville
2009-08-11 0:41 ` Philip Craig
2009-08-11 0:45 ` Philip A. Prindeville
2009-08-06 19:14 ` Philip A. Prindeville
2009-08-06 19:21 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-08-06 15:09 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7B2163.4030805@redfish-solutions.com \
--to=philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com \
--cc=jdl@bigfootnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).