From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:38103 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756162AbZHFUhj (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:37:39 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.195] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n76Kbd1r009217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:37:39 -0700 Message-ID: <4A7B3F13.2000303@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:37:39 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Why are RX packets dropped during scanning? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Can anyone tell me why the ieee80211_rx_h_passive_scan method drops non beacon packets when the hardware is scanning? Why not let them fall through and be processed? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com