From: Dave <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] cfg80211: scan before connect if we don't have the bss
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:01:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8D8F6C.1090804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250710648.8073.9.camel@johannes.local>
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 20:30 +0100, Dave wrote:
>>> Hmm. What if the bssid isn't set? Then the card might select a different
>>> BSS than the one we have on the scan list.
>> That's correct. For the Agere driver that's also true when bssid is set
>> - we can't specify which AP the firmware connects to.
>
> Ok. We may want a feature flag for the latter case so we know what's
> going on, and reject a BSSID setting.
I'll look into that.
>>> And it's all racy too -- by the time the driver calls connect_result(),
>>> the BSS might have expired after it was found here now.
>> Agreed, but with a 15s expiry period I wouldn't expect this to be a
>> problem in practice.
>
> Well, the user could scan, take 12 seconds to pick out the AP manually,
> enter the paramters in another 2.5 seconds, and then it would already
> happen, I think?
As usual, you're right :)
>> Another alternative is for cfg80211_connect_result to trigger the scan
>> if it doesn't have the bss, and only complete the connect when the scan
>> returns. I think I like the sound of this best.
johannes said:
> Good option too, though then it would be useful to pass the channel
> pointer if available to scan only on that channel. Of course, if it
> still can't be found things are really amiss and we should probably
> disconnect and send a failed event to userspace.
Jussi said:
> This sounds best, as with rndis, driver can get currently connected
> bss from device and scan isn't required.
OK, I'll chase this option and see where it goes.
Regards,
Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-20 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-19 0:04 [RFC v2 0/5] orinoco: use cfg80211 for key manipulation David Kilroy
2009-08-19 0:04 ` [RFC 1/5] orinoco: add cfg80211 connect and disconnect David Kilroy
2009-08-19 0:04 ` [RFC 2/5] orinoco: add cfg80211 join_ibss and leave_ibss David Kilroy
2009-08-19 0:04 ` [RFC 3/5] orinoco: implement cfg80211 key manipulation functions David Kilroy
2009-08-19 0:04 ` [RFC 4/5] orinoco: do WE via cfg80211 David Kilroy
2009-08-19 0:04 ` [RFC 5/5] cfg80211: scan before connect if we don't have the bss David Kilroy
2009-08-19 7:48 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-19 19:30 ` Dave
2009-08-19 19:37 ` Johannes Berg
2009-08-20 18:01 ` Dave [this message]
2009-08-20 6:39 ` Jussi Kivilinna
2009-08-31 17:59 ` [RFC v2 0/5] orinoco: use cfg80211 for key manipulation John W. Linville
2009-09-12 23:54 ` Dave Kilroy
2009-10-23 19:05 ` Dave
2009-10-26 13:17 ` Only device wlan1 but no connection Fritz!WLAN USB stick N2.4 Ed Vaessen
2009-10-26 14:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A8D8F6C.1090804@gmail.com \
--to=kilroyd@googlemail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).