From: John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
To: "Gábor Stefanik" <netrolller.3d@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>,
linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: b43 dma error
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:24:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA89BB2.1080205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA890F9.90604@gmail.com>
On 09/09/2009 10:39 PM, John Daiker wrote:
> On 09/08/2009 11:06 AM, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John Daiker<daikerjohn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/08/2009 07:54 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Michael Buesch wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got "Fatal DMA error"
>>>>>> then the controller keep restarting...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.
>>>>
>>>> It is something specific to his system as I don't see anything like
>>>> this. In addition, there are some users on the openSUSE forums that
>>>> have implemented the latest compat-wireless and switched away from
>>>> Broadcom wl to b43 on their LP PHY devices. So far, no complaints from
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Please reboot so that we see the ssb output as well. Use the command
>>>>
>>>> dmesg | egrep "ssb|b43"
>>>>
>>>> That way we will be able to see exactly what kind of device you have
>>>> and what revisions are in it. AFAIK, the testing to date has been
>>>> limited to Rev 1 PHYs and Rev 2 radios.
>>>>
>>>> Larry
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can confirm the same issue. I have a HP Mini 1116NR with a Broadcom
>>> 4312.
>>> Looks to be a PHY 1, Radio 2:
>>>
>>> --snip--
>>> [ 456.165296] b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 6, Type 5, Revision 1
>>> [ 456.165364] b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2062,
>>> Revision 2
>>> --snip--
>>>
>>> I've attached the output of 'dmesg | egrep "ssb|b43"', my kernel
>>> config, and
>>> lspci -vv and lspci -nn
>>>
>>> Note: With the dmesg output, I had unloaded the b43 module previous
>>> 'modprobe -r b43' and then loaded it again with debug output:
>>> 'modprobe b43
>>> verbose=3'
>>>
>>> John Daiker
>>>
>>
>> Again, please test with v478 or v5xx firmware.
>>
>
> I've tried with the v478 firmware (was using 410.2160 earlier). I do not
> see the 'Fatal DMA error' messages anymore.
>
> On another note, however, I can't connect to a network. The device seems
> to alternate between being idle, and scanning for APs.
>
> --snip--
> [ 73.273722] phy0: device no longer idle - scanning
> [ 74.561178] phy0: device now idle
> [ 79.545776] phy0: device no longer idle - scanning
> [ 80.828232] phy0: device now idle
> [ 85.817930] phy0: device no longer idle - scanning
> [ 87.100240] phy0: device now idle
> [ 92.090713] phy0: device no longer idle - scanning
> [ 93.372367] phy0: device now idle
> [ 98.362829] phy0: device no longer idle - scanning
> [ 99.644362] phy0: device now idle
> --snip--
>
> I've attached the relevant portion of my dmesg output for your review.
>
> Where would I got about finding the v5xx firmware?
>
> JD
Found the v5xx firmware along with a patch by Daniel Lenski for
b43-fwcutter on the bcm43xx mailing list. I've tried both versions
(508.102 and 508.1107) without any luck. I see the same 'idle ->
scanning -> idle' loop as before.
Any other ideas?
JD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 13:47 b43 dma error Dave Young
2009-09-08 14:08 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-09-09 7:54 ` Dave Young
2009-09-08 14:38 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-08 14:54 ` Larry Finger
2009-09-08 17:50 ` John Daiker
2009-09-08 18:06 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-09-08 18:15 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-08 18:26 ` Larry Finger
2009-09-10 5:39 ` John Daiker
2009-09-10 6:24 ` John Daiker [this message]
2009-09-08 18:13 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-08 18:26 ` John Daiker
2009-09-08 18:16 ` Larry Finger
2009-09-08 18:24 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-09-08 18:30 ` Larry Finger
2009-09-08 18:32 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-09-09 2:07 ` Larry Finger
2009-09-09 7:41 ` Markus Mueller
2009-09-08 18:32 ` John Daiker
2009-09-09 8:05 ` Dave Young
2009-09-09 8:02 ` Dave Young
2009-09-09 7:56 ` Dave Young
2009-09-10 1:28 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA89BB2.1080205@gmail.com \
--to=daikerjohn@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=netrolller.3d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).