linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Thomas Ilnseher <illth@gmx.de>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Broadcom Wireless <bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH3]Add analog switch support
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:18:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AAEA510.5060606@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252958183.4696.25.camel@luzifer.localnet>

Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
> On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 21:43 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
>> Always send patches to John Linville, and CC linux-wireless.
> Ok, the last try ...
> 
> As I've seen Gàbor's patch, I noticed that my previous patch was
> bullshit. This patch should work:
> 
> (see: http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/PHY/Anacore)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher <illth@gmx.de>
> 

A few points about patch formatting.

The subject of the submittal message should be of the form "[PATCH]
component: Description". For this one, something like "[PATCH] b43:
Add LP PHY analog switch support" would be appropriate. If multiple
versions are needed, indicate that a previous one is superceded by
[PATCH V2] ..., etc.

There should be a line containing --- after the last signed-off-by line.

Anything between the beginning of the e-mail and the --- line becomes
part of the permanent record if the patch is accepted. Usually quoted
material and words like bullshit are avoided. Not always, but usually.

Between the --- line and the start of the patch, you can place
instructions to Linville regarding the circumstances of the patch and
its priority. Such directions are useful to distinguish an improvement
that should wait for the next merge period from a bug fix that should
be sent upstream ASAP. In this case, the patch fixes a system crash on
some platforms and should be applied now.

Larry

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-14 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1252956934.4696.23.camel@luzifer.localnet>
2009-09-14 19:43 ` [PATCH3]Add analog switch support Gábor Stefanik
2009-09-14 19:56   ` Thomas Ilnseher
2009-09-14 20:18     ` Larry Finger [this message]
2009-09-15 12:57       ` John W. Linville
2009-09-14 20:22     ` Thomas Ilnseher
2009-09-14 20:47       ` Michael Buesch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AAEA510.5060606@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=illth@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).