From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:46:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD76184.6030900@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2202 bytes --]
On 15.10.2009 19:53 Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 10/15/2009 01:40 PM:
>
>> On 12-10-2009 13:25, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>>> I have encountered the message in the subject during a test of
>>> the Gigaset CAPI driver, and would like to determine whether
>>> it's a bug in the driver, a bug somewhere else, or no bug at
>>> all. The test scenario was PPP over ISDN with pppd+capiplugin.
>>> In an alternative scenario, also PPP over ISDN but with
>>> smpppd+capidrv, the message did not occur.
I'm sorry, I had confused the two cases. The message occurs in
the smpppd+capidrv scenario, not with pppd+capiplugin.
>>> Johannes' answer pointed me to the netif_rx() function.
>>> The Gigaset driver itself doesn't call that function at all.
>>> In the scenario where I saw the message, it was the SYNC_PPP
>>> line discipline that did.
This analysis was therefore wrong. It would be the netif_rx()
call towards the end of isdn_ppp_push_higher() in
drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c L1177.
>> Anyway, I agree with Michael Buesch there is no reason to waste time
>> for tracking all netif_rx vs netif_rx_ni uses, and it seems we could
>> avoid it by using the "proper" version of raise_softirq_irqoff() in
>> __napi_schedule(). Could anybody try if I'm not wrong?
>>
>> net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>> index 28b0b9e..7fc4009 100644
>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>> @@ -2728,7 +2728,7 @@ void __napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *n)
>>
>> local_irq_save(flags);
>> list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data).poll_list);
>> - __raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
>> + raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
>> local_irq_restore(flags);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__napi_schedule);
I have tested your patch and I can confirm that it fixes the messages.
I have not noticed any ill effects.
Thanks,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-21 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091011095217.GA2200@darkstar>
2009-10-11 10:08 ` NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:17 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-11 10:37 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:38 ` David Miller
2009-10-11 10:55 ` Dave Young
2009-10-11 11:18 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-11 11:40 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-12 8:28 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 10:32 ` David Miller
2009-10-12 11:25 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-15 11:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 17:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 18:46 ` Tilman Schmidt [this message]
2009-10-21 21:19 ` [PATCH] net: Adjust softirq raising in __napi_schedule Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:25 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-21 21:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 8:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:39 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26 7:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26 7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 8:47 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-26 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-27 0:52 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-27 7:01 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-22 11:29 ` David Miller
2009-10-22 12:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 23:37 ` NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 13:34 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:27 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 16:33 ` Tilman Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc \
--to=tilman@imap.cc \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).