From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com ([209.85.219.207]:55605 "EHLO mail-ew0-f207.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758877AbZKEU4d (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:56:33 -0500 Message-ID: <4AF33C02.6040606@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:56:34 +0100 From: Gertjan van Wingerde MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/41] rt2800: add rt2800lib (part three) References: <20091104173151.28463.68742.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20091104173657.28463.90918.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20091104173657.28463.90918.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/04/09 18:36, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Subject: [PATCH] rt2800: add rt2800lib (part three) > > Code unification. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > --- For what it is worth: Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde I wonder how many differences we are going to get between rt2800pci and rt2800usb with respect to register settings, but this is good enough for now. When the differences turn out to be too big, we can always move the affected functions into rt2800_ops and let each driver provide his own version.