From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Antti Kaijanmäki" <antti@kaijanmaki.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New rtl8187 rfkill support blocks my wlan for good.
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:08:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1A93A9.8080009@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260007083.31590.935.camel@peura.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
On 12/05/2009 03:58 AM, Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> pe, 2009-12-04 kello 15:34 -0600, Larry Finger kirjoitti:
>> Antti,
>>
>> From our private tests, you can see my problem with making a change in
>> the rfkill handling. Most of the devices in the hands of the
>> developers do not honor the rfkill switch; however, the one that does
>> works with the current code. This code also matches the latest version
>> of the vendor drivers for the RTL8187L
>> (rtl8187L_linux_26.1038.0626.2009.release) and RTL8187B
>> (rtl8187B_linux_26.1036.0708.2008). If you have newer drivers from
>> Realtek, I would be interested in seeing them.
>
> I attached the one I received.
>
>
>> To make a special case for your system, we need to be able to
>> differentiate it from all other systems. We know that the chip has the
>> same cut (RTL8187BvE V0) as Hin-Tak's, and the same vendor ID (0x04).
>> We do have devices that require parsing additional USB data to get the
>> setup properly initialized. Please send me the full output of the
>> 'lsusb -v' command for the rtl8187 device. I will get the same info
>> from Hin-Tak to see if we can differentiate your two devices.
>
> See the attached lsusb_v.txt
>
>
> I had now some time to look in to this. First of all I was sad to
> discover that the specifications from Realtek have incomplete EEPROM
> register descriptions and they are no use to figure this problem out.
> But at least they describe the functionality so that it's easier to find
> out what's going on with the drivers.
>
> I looked through the reference driver and found out that indeed the GPIO
> pin is different for some devices, mine included (0x8198).
>
> r8187_core.c:L4359
>
> if((idProduct == 0x8197) || (idProduct == 0x8198)) {
> priv->EEPROMSelectNewGPIO =((u8)((eprom_read(dev,EPROM_SELECT_GPIO) & 0xff00) >> 8)) ? true : false;
> DMESG("EPROM_SELECT_GPIO:%d", priv->EEPROMSelectNewGPIO);
> } else {
> priv->EEPROMSelectNewGPIO = false;
> }
>
>
>
> Here's the begining of the RFKILL code (see, 0x2 vs. 0x4!)
>
> r8187_core.c:L6258
>
> tmp1byte = read_nic_byte(dev,GPE);
> if(priv->EEPROMSelectNewGPIO == true)
> tmp1byte &= ~BIT2;
> else
> tmp1byte &= ~BIT1;
>
> write_nic_byte(dev,GPE,tmp1byte);
>
>
> I would like to prepare a proper patch, but I'm afraid I do not have the
> time right now and someone else can probably do it a lot faster. The
> current rfkill code is now in 2.6.32 and some people are going to find
> out that their wlan no longer is accessible because of insufficient
> rfkill detection so this puts this somewhat higher priority.
Thanks for this info. Your reference driver is indeed newer than the
one that I had. With the info from it, I will prepare a patch for you,
Hin-Tak, and anyone else to test. It should be ready yet today.
Larry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-05 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-02 12:25 New rtl8187 rfkill support blocks my wlan for good Antti Kaijanmäki
2009-12-02 16:30 ` Larry Finger
2009-12-03 6:44 ` Antti Kaijanmäki
2009-12-03 12:01 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-12-03 13:33 ` Larry Finger
2009-12-03 13:40 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-12-04 21:34 ` Larry Finger
2009-12-05 9:58 ` Antti Kaijanmäki
2009-12-05 12:04 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-12-05 12:53 ` Antti Kaijanmäki
2009-12-05 15:32 ` Antti Kaijanmäki
2009-12-05 17:08 ` Larry Finger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B1A93A9.8080009@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=antti@kaijanmaki.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).