From: 海藻敬之 <tkaiso@thinktube.com>
To: 8an@praha12.net
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: Reimplement clock rate to usec conversion
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:43:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B320265.7050807@thinktube.com> (raw)
Thanks, Lukas
> According to my interpretation the calculation should depend
> on channel width (20MHz in normal mode, 40MHz in turbo mode, same for 802.11g
> and 802.11a), not on MAC chip clocks.
thanks, then my guess was irrelevant...
I got some improvement (even not so significant), but I might have
mislead myself at this moment .
let me show my observation during last a few days.
at first
- chip is AR5414
- I pulled down codes via git a week before and your recent patches were
applied.
then what I have observed till now was
1. stable and excellent throughput for 5GHz (with 1hop and also 2hops cases)
16Mbps(1hop) , 8Mbps(2hops)
note: testing with IBSS ad-hoc mode, 1 hop, 2hops , 3 hops..
2. still not good and unstable throughput for 2.4Ghz
thanks to your patch[3/5], [4/5], throughput was improved pretty much
but still staying around 10~15Mbps(1hop), 1Mbps~6Mbps(2hops)
without my experimental patch, 2hops throughput was
worse than the case with that patch.
( 1~2Mbps vs 1~6Mbps --> I can't say this difference is significant ) .
debugfs(rc_stats) shows minstrel reported around 85%~95 success
rate with 48/54Mbps and selected low xmit rate.
(this was the result on limited number of tests. five ~ ten times )
in my these tests, node is sitting pretty close (1m) to each other,
therefore I did not enable RTS/CTS and just counted on physical
carrier sense.
Does it seem that there still exist vulnerable part around carrier
sensing for 2.4GHz.?
anyway,
I would like to get back to this issue, again later
thanks
Taka
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-23 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-23 11:43 海藻敬之 [this message]
2009-12-23 13:54 ` [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: Reimplement clock rate to usec conversion Lukáš Turek
[not found] <4B32B76D.3090508@thinktube.com>
2009-12-26 17:55 ` Lukáš Turek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-15 17:56 [PATCH 0/5] Setting coverage class (and ACK timeout and slot time), take two Lukáš Turek
2009-12-15 17:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: Reimplement clock rate to usec conversion Lukáš Turek
2009-12-21 10:26 ` [ath5k-devel] " 海藻敬之
2009-12-21 12:38 ` Lukáš Turek
[not found] ` <4B301FE9.2020702@thinktube.com>
2009-12-22 16:08 ` Lukáš Turek
[not found] ` <4B2F50DD.60701@thinktube.com>
2009-12-21 12:40 ` Lukáš Turek
2009-12-21 15:08 ` Bob Copeland
2009-12-21 15:28 ` Lukáš Turek
2009-12-22 3:28 ` Bob Copeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B320265.7050807@thinktube.com \
--to=tkaiso@thinktube.com \
--cc=8an@praha12.net \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).