linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: mac80211: fix queue selection for data frames on monitor interfaces
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:51:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4C622F.1050602@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100112093733.GA2548@mail.wantstofly.org>

On 2010-01-12 10:37 AM, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 06:47:00AM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> 
>> When ieee80211_monitor_select_queue encounters data frames, it selects
>> the WMM AC based on skb->priority and assumes that skb->priority
>> contains a valid 802.1d tag. However this assumption is incorrect, since
>> ieee80211_select_queue has not been called at this point.
>> If skb->priority > 7, an array overrun occurs, which could lead to
>> invalid values, resulting in crashes in the tx path.
> 
> What you describe here was already reported and fixed:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=126287290723244&w=2
> 	http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git;a=commit;h=045cfb71a3901005bf6dcedae98cecb3360a0bfc
> 
> Your commit message could at least acknowledge this.  I.e. write
> that the existing fix doesn't handle QoS data frames in the optimal
> way, and then mention this:
Sorry, when I wrote and posted the patch, I hadn't seen your previous
fix yet, because I was apparently looking at the wrong tree and had not
noticed your submission yet.
It only cleanly applied to a tree without your change, but it seems that
John fixed it up and replaced your fix with it anyway.

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-12 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-11  5:47 mac80211: fix queue selection for data frames on monitor interfaces Felix Fietkau
2010-01-11 16:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-01-12  3:02   ` Felix Fietkau
2010-01-12  9:37 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2010-01-12 11:51   ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-01-12 16:51     ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B4C622F.1050602@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).