linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Joerg Pommnitz <pommnitz@yahoo.com>
Cc: rootkit85@yahoo.it, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Significiant performance differences between ath5k and ath9k in 802.11a
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:23:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B629AF5.40706@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <256732.66854.qm@web51401.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

On 2010-01-29 9:10 AM, Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> --- rootkit85@yahoo.it <rootkit85@yahoo.it> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Can you try in AP-client mode? I think you'll get more
>> throughput so.
>> 
> 
> No, IBSS is what I'm interested in. And the point is, that there is
> a 30% performance difference between ath5k (and Madwifi) and ath9k. Even
> if the performance in AP mode would be better, this does not change the
> problem in IBSS mode.
I can confirm these numbers for AP/Client mode as well. I've even tested
legacy communication between ath9k ap and sta, producing the same
result. Additionally, I can rule out the rate control algorithm, as
using minstrel instead of the ath9k RC produces a very similar
throughput test result.

- Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-29  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-28 15:13 Significiant performance differences between ath5k and ath9k in 802.11a Joerg Pommnitz
2010-01-28 16:12 ` [ath9k-devel] " rootkit85
2010-01-29  8:10   ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-01-29  8:23     ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2010-02-04  8:31       ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-02-01 17:50 ` Adam Wozniak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B629AF5.40706@openwrt.org \
    --to=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pommnitz@yahoo.com \
    --cc=rootkit85@yahoo.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).