linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Wozniak <awozniak@irobot.com>
To: Joerg Pommnitz <pommnitz@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org,
	ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: Re: Significiant performance differences between ath5k and ath9k in 802.11a
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:50:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B67147E.6080800@irobot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <774870.89795.qm@web51401.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

Your numbers for ath9k in the 5GHz band jibe with what I've observed for 
the ar9170 in ad-hoc mode.
If you go down to 2.4GHz you'll see about 16MBit/s.

I have no other numbers to offer for comparison.

--Adam

Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a strange performance problem with ath9k. I have two otherwise identical systems with an ath5k-supported card in system ATH5K and an ath9k supported card in system ATH9K.
> Doing an UDP iperf run were ATH5K is the client/sender and ATH9K is the server/receiver I easily get data rates of 31MBit/s (tx data rate on the sender is manually set to 54 MBit/s).
> Running the same test with ATH9K as client/sender and ATH5K as server/receiver gives maximum data rates of about 22MBit/s, about 30% less.
>
> Doing the test against another ath9k system (e.g. ATH9K ==> ATH9K2) gives
> the same max data rate of only 22 MBit/s, so the problem seems to be the
> ath9k driver or the hardware. Can anybody confirm these problems? Is this
> a known limitation? Any buttons to push to get things going faster?
>
> Details:
> the ath5k card is a AR2413 based design (Compex WLM54AG), the ath9k card
> is a AR9220 (Compex WLM200NX 6A). The systems are connected in IBSS mode 
> on channel 40 (5200MHz).
> The kernel version is wireless-testing as of January, 26. The kernel is
> slightly patched to enable IBSS in 802.11a (we are allowed to do this).
>
> Can anybody shed some light on this strange issue? Luis?
>
>   


      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-01 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-28 15:13 Significiant performance differences between ath5k and ath9k in 802.11a Joerg Pommnitz
2010-01-28 16:12 ` [ath9k-devel] " rootkit85
2010-01-29  8:10   ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-01-29  8:23     ` Felix Fietkau
2010-02-04  8:31       ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-02-01 17:50 ` Adam Wozniak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B67147E.6080800@irobot.com \
    --to=awozniak@irobot.com \
    --cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pommnitz@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).