From: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault@free.fr>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Gábor Stefanik" <netrolller.3d@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Drop protected data frames that have not been decrypted
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:36:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B79CC6B.5000905@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266226483.7084.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Johannes Berg a écrit :
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 08:45 +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
>
>
>>> I'm not familiar with this part of the code; but have you tested if
>>> this doesn't break monitor-while-operating mode (i.e. doesn't remove
>>> other-STA frames from monitor interfaces)?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, it has been tested in this case. In fact, this patch changes RX
>> path only in ieee80211_rx_h_data / ieee80211_rx_h_action and
>> ieee80211_rx_h_mgmt. In all 3 cases, it returns RX_DROP_MONITOR.
>>
>
> ???
>
> if (ieee80211_drop_unencrypted(rx, mgmt->frame_control))
> return RX_DROP_UNUSABLE;
>
This code was not in wireless-testing/master yesterday when I sent the
patches.
> However. GUYS!!! Read the code! Real monitor mode bypasses _ALL_ the RX
> handlers, frames just short-circuit up right after they are received
> from the driver.
>
Just for my own understanding. It seems the implementation has 2
different code path :
- "real" monitor mode which is handled right after ieee80211_rx() so it
is not affected
- "cook" monitor mode which is handled as part of the RX handlers.
BTW, why do we have 2 different code path? I'm sure I missed something
obvious here.
> johannes
>
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-15 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-14 23:37 [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Drop protected data frames that have not been decrypted Benoit Papillault
2010-02-14 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: Add HT IE to IBSS beacons and probe responses Benoit Papillault
2010-02-15 9:35 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-15 22:32 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-16 7:17 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-15 0:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: Drop protected data frames that have not been decrypted Gábor Stefanik
2010-02-15 7:45 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-15 9:34 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-15 22:36 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT [this message]
2010-02-16 7:18 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-15 9:36 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-16 9:58 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B79CC6B.5000905@free.fr \
--to=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netrolller.3d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).