From: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault@free.fr>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com,
ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: Fix TX/RX padding for all frames
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:01:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7B9438.9020601@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100217061523.GA5147@jm.kir.nu>
Jouni Malinen a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
>
>> I don't have an ath5k based card at hand. I will try to grab one and
>> will give an example of said frame. Basically, I followed the same
>> strategy for ath9k already.
>>
>
> Are you saying that this patch has not actually been tested at all on
> ath5k and it was just based on the changes you did for ath9k? If that is
> the case, I would suggest running the tests before actually applying
> this. We should really not depend on undocumented hardware behavior to
> remain the same between different revisions. That's why I did not like
> the changes in ath9k and would not exactly like extending that to even
> more different chips taken into account that none of this is needed for
> normal use of the card.
>
>
No. It has been tested the same way I tested ath9k, ie using 2 cards in
monitor mode and reading/writing 802.11 frame and checking that they are
the same on the other side. I just need to swap my ath9k based card
(AR9280) with an ath5k based card (AR5212) in my laptop and redo the
test. I will do so in a couple of days.
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-17 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-14 23:36 [PATCH] ath5k: Fix TX/RX padding for all frames Benoit Papillault
2010-02-15 20:15 ` Bob Copeland
2010-02-15 22:06 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-16 0:47 ` Bob Copeland
2010-02-16 20:39 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-17 6:15 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-02-17 7:01 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT [this message]
[not found] <--to jirislaby@gmail.com --to mickflemm@gmail.com \>
2010-02-27 12:58 ` Benoit Papillault
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-27 20:58 [ath5k-devel] " Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-27 22:05 ` Benoit Papillault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7B9438.9020601@free.fr \
--to=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).